Saturday, 14 June, 2025
Support the Planet Keeper projects

Refreezing the Arctic: Innovative Projects to Save the Polar Ice

The accelerated melting of the Arctic sea ice is one of the most alarming indicators of climate change. In response, several bold initiatives have emerged, aiming not only to slow down the melting but to actively rebuild the ice. Among them, the pioneering projects of the startups Arctic Reflections and Real Ice propose technological innovations that could reshape the future of the Arctic.

Share this content

The Critical Role of Arctic Sea Ice

Since 1979, the summer extent of Arctic sea ice has plummeted by roughly 40%, while the oldest, thickest ice cover has been reduced by over 95%. This loss undermines the Earth’s thermostat—sea ice reflects up to 80% of incoming solar radiation. Without it, our planet soaks up heat, accelerating global warming in a feedback loop that drives rising seas, erratic weather patterns, and the collapse of habitats vital to polar bears, walruses, and myriad other Arctic species.

Arctic Reflections: Scaling Centuries-Old Techniques

When I visited Svalbard in April 2024, I joined Max Bergman’s Dutch team for the first field trials of Arctic Reflections. Inspired by traditional Dutch ice-rink methods, their approach pumps cold seawater onto the ice surface in thin, controlled layers during the Arctic winter. Almost instantly, each layer freezes, thickening the ice naturally. In partnership with Delft University of Technology and UNIS, they demonstrated measurable gains in ice thickness—enough to withstand more of the summer melt. Their ambition is to deploy modular, renewable-powered pumping stations across vulnerable stretches of the Arctic Ocean.

Real Ice: Autonomous Drones at Work


Meanwhile, in Canada’s Cambridge Bay, I observed test flights of Real Ice’s hydrogen-powered underwater drones. Spearheaded by marine-robotics expert Dr. Eleanor Hughes, these drones bore tiny drills that puncture thinning ice, then inject a fine mist of seawater onto the surface. Early results showed treated zones gaining up to 80 cm of additional thickness. Dr. Hughes envisions a fleet of 500,000 drones covering one million square kilometers of sea ice—at an estimated cost of $6 billion per year. It sounds immense, yet pales beside the economic wreckage of unchecked Arctic decline.

Engineering for Sustainability

Both ventures prioritize low-impact deployment. Wind, solar, and hydrogen fuel their equipment, while noise-dampening design minimizes disturbance to sensitive seals and narwhals. Real Ice’s “smart coordination” uses AI driven by satellite data to target the worst-hit regions, maximizing efficiency and reducing wasted effort.

Questions on Scale, Cost, and Consequence

But as I watched pumps burble and drones hum against the stark Arctic horizon, I couldn’t escape a nagging question: are we trading one form of energy excess for another? Mobilizing and sustaining these high-tech fleets in subzero conditions demands enormous resources. Will our hope in geoengineering dilute the political will to slash greenhouse emissions? And might the machinery, however quiet and renewable-powered, still disrupt fragile ecosystems in ways we cannot yet foresee?

Toward a Combined Strategy

Leading researchers like Dr. Julienne Stroeve of UCL stress that geo-intervention is a stopgap, not a substitute: “We must pair refreezing methods with immediate, deep emissions cuts.” Indigenous communities and conservation bodies echo this, urging that any refreezing project be nested within broader habitat protection and climate-justice frameworks.

Planet Keeper’s Commitment

At Planet Keeper, we’re monitoring these initiatives closely. Through our subscriber network and KeeperFace community, we aim to:

  • Elevate public awareness of Arctic ice’s global importance

  • Channel funds and expertise to expand field trials

  • Advocate for transparent, science-led deployment that respects local ecosystems and rights

As I returned south, watching the Arctic fade beneath a low sun, I felt both cautious optimism and sober realism. These technological leaps offer a chance to buy time—but only if we heed the lesson they deliver: that restoring our planet demands far more than clever machines. It requires collective resolve to reduce emissions, protect ecosystems, and honor the limits of our home.

Sources

SourceGEO
Margot C.
Margot C.https://planet-keeper.org/
Investigative Journalist & Environmental Advocate Margot C. is a British journalist, graduate of the London School of Journalism, with a focus on major climate and ecological issues. Hailing from Manchester and an avid mountaineer, she began her career with independent outlets in Dublin, covering citizen mobilizations and nature-conservation projects. Since 2018, she has worked closely with Planet Keeper, producing in-depth field reports and investigations on the real-world impacts of climate change. Over the years, Margot has built a robust network of experts—including scientists, NGOs, and local communities—to document deforestation, plastic pollution, and pioneering ecosystem-restoration efforts. Known for her direct, engaged style, she combines journalistic rigor with genuine empathy to amplify the voices of threatened regions. Today, Margot divides her time between London and remote field expeditions, driven by curiosity and high standards to illuminate the most pressing environmental challenges.

Article Quality Score

Sources:
100%
Neutrality:
50%
Writing:
80%
Average:
76.7%

Quick Article Quiz

Answer the following questions to reinforce what you have learned in this article.

Leave a review

Rating

Read more

More

Thanks for this informationRefreezing the Arctic: Innovative Projects to Save the Polar Ice